Why do I so often wax nostalgic in this blog of mine? Why do
I choose to typically write about the past and not current affairs? Rest
assured, I’m not living in the past, although sometimes I really wish I could
venture back in time and experience, for one brief shining moment at least, some of that lost youthful exuberance. No,
I’m well aware that it’s 2013, and that my government is on holiday. And, too,
I’m not as spry as I was in 1978, or even 1997 for that matter, with a lot less hair atop my head. My wiffle and
stickball days are only memories.
When I started blogging a few years ago, I had no master
plan for what I’d write about. I had no agenda. Initially, I considered writing about writing, because that’s what I do. But I quickly
realized there wasn’t much that I could say that hasn’t already been said,
and what I would say would be largely clichés. Occasionally, I’ve written about
stuff going on in the here and now, but I try to keep it personal and
anecdotal. I endeavor to avoid political diatribes or rants on the
burning issues of the day. Why bother? Everybody and his grandfather is
sounding off, and I’m not about to convince anybody to join my side, so why
write about the dunderheads in Washington, D.C., or a New York City mayoral
election that should, on paper, be interesting but instead is a colossal bore.
Rewinding the clock and recalling bits and pieces of the past are usually a safe bet. Virtually everybody loves blasts from the pasts—from a
seemingly simpler time before iPhones, cable television, and outlandish grocery
store prices. Time travel somehow bridges the partisan divide, as does love for
cats, dogs, and the animal kingdom. One of my favorite movies of all time is About
Schmidt starring Jack Nicholson. He plays a retired insurance man named
Walter Schmidt, who feels his life has largely been meaningless. Walter decides to sponsor a child in Africa named Ndugu, and periodically corresponds
with him. Near the end of the film, we hear Schmidt’s voice-over reciting a
letter sent to Ndugu. “Relatively soon, I will die,” he says. “Maybe in twenty
years, maybe tomorrow—it doesn’t matter. Once I am dead and everyone who knew
me dies, too, it’ll be though I never even existed. What difference have my
life made to anyone? None that I can think of—none at all.”
About Schmidt, to me, is the quintessential "meaning of life
movie." We can take from it whatever we choose to take from it. We see in the film’s
final scene that Walter’s life made a difference—to Ndugu at least. But still we are left to contemplate if that really is enough. Walter Schmidt, though, absolutely hits the nail on
the head about people soon being forgotten once those who knew them are gone. I
see it happening right now with friends and relations in my life who are no longer among the living.
So, really, that’s another big reason why I blog about the past mostly.
It's sort of writer’s duty, I'd say—to help us remember what was and to never forget where we came from. The picture accompanying this blog is of my grandmother, aunt, father
(then on leave from his stint in the army), and grandfather. It was the early
1950s in a neighborhood called Kingsbridge in the Bronx—a partially bucolic setting back
then and worlds apart from whence they came. The Nigros moved to this predominantly Irish enclave in 1946 from Manhattan's Morningside Heights. Despite a handful of their Irish neighbors on the unwelcoming committee saying, "There goes the neighborhood," it was paradise. It's up to me, I guess, to not let it be a paradise lost forever.
(Photo from the personal collection of Nicholas Nigro)
(Photo from the personal collection of Nicholas Nigro)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.